Document Category: Urban
| Image | Title | Summary | Categories | Link | hf:doc_categories | hf:doc_tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Power Threat Meaning Framework | The Power Threat Meaning Framework is an over-arching structure for identifying patterns in emotional distress, unusual experiences and troubling behaviour, as an alternative to psychiatric diagnosis and classification. The project team’s aim was to produce a foundational document which sets out the philosophical, theoretical and empirical basis for such a framework and describes how it can serve as a conceptual alternative to psychiatric classification in relation to emotional distress and troubled or troubling behaviour. This is an overview. A full 400+ page report is available from the British Psychological Society. | Children and Young People, City, Coastal, Community Cohesion, Community Development, Community Spaces and Places, County-Wide, Education/Training, Equality and Diversity, Everyone, Families, Female, LGBTQ+, Lone Parents, Male, Mental Health and Wellbeing, Older People, People From Minoritised Communities, People with Mental Health Difficulties, People with Multiple Disabilities, People with Physical Disabilities, Refugees/Asylum Seekers/Immigrants, Rural, Support Service Activities, UK, Urban, Village | children-and-young-people city coastal community-cohesion community-development community-spaces-and-places county-wide education-training equality-and-diversity everyone families female lgbtq lone-parents male mental-health-and-wellbeing older-people people-from-minoritised-communities people-with-mental-health-difficulties people-with-multiple-disabilities people-with-physical-disabilities refugees-asylum-seekers-immigrants rural support-service-activities uk urban village demographics geography service-themes | guidance-document research-paper toolkit-and-resources | |
 | Working Paper – The effects of youth clubs on education and crime | This report provides the first causal estimates of the effects of youth clubs on education and crime, leveraging quasi-experimental variation from austerity-related cuts, which led to the closure of 30% of youth clubs in London between 2010-19. Difference-in-differences research designs and novel data were used to compare neighbourhoods. Teenagers in areas affected performed nearly 4% worse in national high-school exams. Youths aged 10 to 17 became 14% more likely to commit crimes. Closing youth clubs was not cost-effective; for every £1 saved from closures, there are associated losses of nearly £3 due to forgone returns to education and crime costs. | Children and Young People, Urban | children-and-young-people urban demographics geography | social-impact-report |